Questions That Close Doors in Journalism Interviews
For adults returning to writing who want interviews that actually work
For adults returning to writing who want interviews that actually work
There is a widespread assumption that more questions means a better interview. Working journalists who contribute to any serious News platform will tell you the opposite is closer to the truth.
Leading questions are the first to go. Asking someone if they feel the council made a poor decision tells them what answer you want, and careful sources will simply stop talking.
Double-barrelled questions are equally damaging. When you ask two things at once, the source answers the easier one and the harder question disappears entirely.
The most reliable shift is moving from closed questions to observations. Saying what you noticed and waiting is often more productive than asking anything at all.
Sources respond to curiosity differently than they respond to interrogation. The distinction sounds small. In practice, it determines whether someone talks to you again.